Independent 8,861 / Radian

Owing to difficulties accessing the puzzle, I am posting this blog somewhat later than is customary, for which I apologise. Radian has conjured up our daily dose of lexical gymnastics this Tuesday. I … Read more >>

Financial Times 14,875 by NEO

My first blog entry for several years, so be patient!

This was a fairly straightforward solve, with no clue taking more than a minute to solve.  I don’t like the use of names as synonyms in the middle of clues which spoiled a couple of them for me, but that’s a personal thing.

Read more >>

Guardian Quiptic 799 Moley

A fair Quiptic, with a couple of clues that I felt weren’t that cryptic, even for a Quiptic.  Thanks to Moley.  Definitions are underlined in the clues. Across 7    Goddess just atrophied away (9) … Read more >>

Beelzebub 1,304

Apologies for the slightly tardy posting. I’ve only just managed to finish this one, though I think that’s more down to my own disorganisation this week, rather than this being an unusually challenging … Read more >>

Guardian Prize 26,507 / Paul

This was one of those puzzles which, at first glance, with all the cross-references, cause the heart to sink a little and, at first glance, the two XXs looked a little daunting, too … Read more >>

Independent 8,858 by Phi

The usual from Phi: a very pleasant and sound crossword that maintains the high standard. And as usual I am a bit lost on one or two, but these will I’m sure be explained.

As I say below, I had thought there might be an astronomical theme, but failing that, and this theory does I think fail, I can’t see anything else.

Definitions underlined.

Read more >>

Financial Times 14,872 by PETO

I thought PETO (unusual for a Friday) set a puzzle that was more approachable than some his earlier servings. I still needed to use the internet to confirm my answers for a couple of clues which I hadnt come across before. 14ac could use some help.

A lovely start to this Friday. Thanks to Peto for a delectable challenge.

Read more >>