Financial Times 14881 Phssthpok

(Please click here for this same blog but with a picture quiz added. Please do NOT post hereinbelow any comment relating to the picture quiz. Thank you.)   A slightly harder Phssthpok than usual, … Read more >>

Financial Times 14,878 by MUDD

A pleasant challenge from MUDD that provided a fine blend of write-ins, deducibles and hard cryptics. Steady progress through the lower half literally laid the foundation for the remainder. By my own standards, if I didnt require much help solving MUDD, it means he is taking it easy on me. Thanks MUDD for this excellent Friday treat.

Read more >>

Financial Times 14,876 by ALBERICH

I enjoyed this very much.  Nice to have some good straightforward cryptic puzzles in the mix.  No bells and whistles just quality clues and a sensible grid.  Thanks Alberich.

Read more >>

Financial Times 14,875 by NEO

My first blog entry for several years, so be patient!

This was a fairly straightforward solve, with no clue taking more than a minute to solve.  I don’t like the use of names as synonyms in the middle of clues which spoiled a couple of them for me, but that’s a personal thing.

Read more >>

Financial Times 14,872 by PETO

I thought PETO (unusual for a Friday) set a puzzle that was more approachable than some his earlier servings. I still needed to use the internet to confirm my answers for a couple of clues which I hadnt come across before. 14ac could use some help.

A lovely start to this Friday. Thanks to Peto for a delectable challenge.

Read more >>

Financial Times 14,862 – Crux

Monday Prize Crossword / Feb 23, 2015

A puzzle from Crux somewhere between a Dac and a Dante/Rufus. Too many cryptic definitions to my taste today.

Read more >>

Financial Times 14,866 by BRADMAN

A reunion with the Don this Friday. A very pleasant challenge with some clues that were just out of reach (annoyingly so) as a direct solve. I had to resort to looking up Google for confirming the parsing for a couple of clues.

Read more >>