A welcome return to eXternal, not seen since Twixmas.
Preamble: Wordplay in each across clue generates a letter not required for the answer; in clue order, these give information about an event. Where there are two down entries in a column, a single letter must be removed from each answer to form the entry, wordplay leading to the mutilated entry. In column order, letters removed from upper entries give one thematic name and those from lower entries give another. Finally, solvers must change two symmetrically placed entries to show a change of title (3 words) after the event. All final entries are real words or phrases.
I went through the across clues with moderate success, but was halted briefly by the entries for the first few down answers – not real words. But all felt OK when I quickly remembered “All final entries are real words or phrases”, and doubtless matters would be resolved by the changes to be made in the endgame. 
The down entries in the upper right side were real words though, as were those in the lower left; however, some entries in the lower right weren’t, but that’s where the symmetrical placement of the changes would bite.
The different manipulations for the across and down clues/answers/entries wasn’t really a problem when going through first the across clues and then the down ones, but when it came to tackling the remaining, say, 25% which involved dotting back and forth between across and down I found it required quite a lot of concentration.
What would emerge as GRACE KELLY and RAINIER III had been clear for some time, but I was a bit slower to make complete sense of the information coming from the across clues – just ever so slightly too fragmented. But before too long I had CURRENT DAY MONTH AND I?NUMBER, and it was obvious that the ? had to be Q, but what to make of IQ NUMBER? I’d already clocked that the pair had got married on 18 April 1956 and that the publication date of the puzzle was 50 years on … and then the head-slap – 1956 is the puzzle number (and IQ = Inquisitor).
Current entries at 2d, 3d, 4d, 5d & 7d up top, and 36d, 37d & 34d down below weren’t real words so the entries to change had to fix that which meant we were targeting 13a and the symmetric 43a. A quick check and sure enough PRINCESS OF MONACO was the change of title that did the trick.
Thanks, eXternal. Not that difficult a puzzle, but well-engineered. It probably wouldn’t make an anthology unless all the puzzles indicated the full date they were published and the publication they appeared in.
An excellent, well-conceived, well-constructed and well-clued Inquisitor. I found the Down clues generally a tad harder to solve than the Acrosses. I came to a stop with just 38 ALAE to solve, leaving a gap in the collected ‘extra’ letters with ‘Q’ to follow it – a ‘problem’ very similar to that noted by the blogger! That pair of letters surely had to be HQ or IQ, and it took me also longer than it should have to see the meaning of ‘IQ NUMBER’. Given GRACE KELLY and RAINIER III (arising from the Down clues), PRINCESS OF MONACO was an obvious guess at the new ‘title’, and I decided simply to try the three pairs of symmetrically placed eight-letter words in turn to see which of them would accommodate the change, incidentally forgetting that there were a few non-words to resolve in the grid. It turned out to be the first such pair I tried (ENOUNCED/INSECURE) – a very satisfying outcome.
Thanks to both eXternal and HolyGhost.
I made steady progress on this one, being helped with the unsolved clues once I had enough to guess the two names. I was amazed to find that our wedding anniversary is on the same day of the year.
I am afraid tunnel vision then made me miss the final step! I was convinced that “Change of Title” required the lady’s title before and after the event. I had spotted the dubious entry NOSAN so tried to fit FILM STAR or PRINCESS into 43a but, of course, to no avail. I looked on Wiki for ideas and there was a nice picture of Grace with her 3-word title given beneath but the penny still did not drop. So, I logged on to this site and read just enough of HG’s blog to spot the culprit but without peeking at the grid. I then took me seconds rather than minutes to complete.
I really must learn to stop when I am stuck and ask myself “have I missed something?”
Many thanks to eXternal for a great puzzle which I much enjoyed, despite my own shortcoming, and to HG for his usual excellent analysis.
One of those IQs where a decent guess at the theme was possible before the end, from R A I N … (I live not far from Monaco so the name is somewhat familiar) appearing under the grid, and that correct theory helped enormously on the down clues that had been holding out! But the acrosses still had gaps at that point so it wasn’t completely plain sailing. Very nicely constructed, and the device of excluding a letter (and sometimes having non-words) was an interesting change to the norm.
Many thanks to eXternal and HolyGhost
I found this a straightforward anniversary puzzle, not requiring the burrowing into weird corners of knowledge that an Inquisitor sometimes demands (for my generation, Princess Grace of Monaco, or her children, were figures who was always turning up somewhere in the gossip columns). Disentangling the upper and lower clues, and remembering that a couple of them were neither, caused a bit of confusion, but I got to the IQ link without much head-scratching, and enjoyed it all. Thanks to eXternal and HolyGhost.
I made steady progress with this, but like others I was momentarily blocked by “IQ Number” until the penny dropped. It was pretty plain sailing once I spotted Rainier and realised that I didn’t have to find a word with five “I”s in it. Thanks to setter for putting together a puzzle that had a 1956 theme without reference to Suez and to Ghost for expertly showing the working