Financial Times 15,299 by BRADMAN

I thought this was on the tougher side of Bradman’s usual offerings. A lot of good solid clues, with some that were made difficult by me not knowing the word. All in all a good workout. Thanks Don!

Read more >>

Financial Times 15,297 by JULIUS

I enjoyed this, but there is one I can’t get and one not fully explained.   I am away from home writing this from a hotel room.  I have to leave soon and I am not sure if I will be able to update the blog again today.  Please add your own explanations on the comments section.  Thank you Julius.

Read more >>

Financial Times 15,293 by WANDERER

A very pleasant and relatively easier challenge (compared to his past offerings) from Wanderer. It was smooth sailing all the way, with impeccable cluing (save for one which I have queried in my blog below) and some refreshingly semi-new wordplays. All in all, a bright spot on a dreary Friday, so thanks Wanderer !!

Read more >>

Financial Times 15,291 by JASON

I thought this a good straightforward puzzle.  Often when one reads ‘straightforward’ in an introduction it is a eupemism for either ‘too easy’ or ‘dull’ – in this case not so.  I didn’t coast though this nor did I find it boring.  In the race to provide ever more new and innovative clues I think good straightforward puzzles sometimes get overlooked.  Thank you Jason.

Read more >>

Financial Times 15,287 by BRADMAN

A quick puzzle from Bradman this Friday, straightforward for 95% of the grid. A couple of clues were significantly tougher than the average for the crossword and that kept me from a finish that reflected the rapid start. Apologies for the late post, had saved a draft and then got tied up with some errands.

Read more >>