A masterclass from Chalmie this Friday morning.
FT
Financial Times 15,493 by JULIUS
4,20 for a tough puzzle…
Financial Times 15,484 – Falcon
Monday Prize Crossword / Feb 27, 2017
Monday puzzles are usually easy and this one was no exception.
Financial Times 15,483 by Alberich
Prize puzzle from the Weekend FT of February 25, 2017
Financial Times 15,492 by LOROSO
A super puzzle from Loroso who is back making regular appearances again. Long may this continue. I found this pretty tricky and I made it extra-hard for myself by writing in a couple of incorrect answers at 14d down and 26 across. Thank you Loroso.
Financial Times 15,491 by CRUX
A quick and cheerful solve this morning, with some pleasing surfaces.
Financial Times 15,488 by WANDERER
A riveting challenge from a much-welcome setter, with just the right level of frustrating yet innovative clues. Thanks Wanderer !!
Financial Times 15,487 by REDSHANK
A challenging Thursday puzzle…
Financial Times 15,478 – Dante
Monday Prize Crossword / Feb 20, 2017
Perhaps it’s just me but I found this Dante puzzle easy to start but difficult to finish.
Financial Times 15,477 by Mudd
Prize puzzle from the Weekend FT of February 18, 2017
Financial Times 15,486 by GAFF
Tough but all gettable with enough concentration. There is a lot going on in here and it took me a long time to sort it all out and get it written up into the blog. Thanks Gaff, super puzzle.
Financial Times 15,485 by ARMONIE
Huzzah, a ‘normal’ Tuesday FT. After a brief run of absolute stinkers (which were fun but mucked up my modest life-schedule, and yours if you finished them), a straightforward and elegantly composed mid-week puzzle. Thanks to Armonie and the powers that be.
Financial Times 15,482 by BRADMAN
A mixed bag from the DON this morning, thanks to whom for an interesting challenge. The few clues that held me up accounted for 90% of the solve time! 🙂
Financial Times 15,481 by PETO
One of those puzzles that takes longer to blog than to solve.
Financial Times 15,472 – Mudd
Monday Prize Crossword / Feb 13, 2017
This took me slightly longer than the average Mudd.
Very enjoyable, with some naughtiness included too.