Financial Times 18,204 by MUDD

I usually find Mudd rather breezy and accessible, but I never really hit my stride on today’s puzzle. Except for one minor note, I think the clues are all right, so I am not sure what all my plodding was about.

Read more >>

Gemelo No. 13 – Plain

Stepping back from last week’s anagrammatic convolutions, this week’s “plain” Gemelo seemed relatively straightforward by comparison.  Completion of the grid was helped considerably by solving the four perimeter clues.

Read more >>

Financial Times 18,192 by PETO

I was really struggling with today’s challenge from Peto until I was nearly three-quarters done, when the remaining solutions seemed to fall into place all at once.  I found the clues quite good overall.

Read more >>

Gemelo No. 8 – Plain

This is my first foray into blogging a Gemelo puzzle. I have managed to solve Nos. 1-7, but I would agree with Andrew’s comment from last week, that the style of the clues is a little different from Azed–a style that I am still getting the hang of. This week’s grid is unusual for having six fully-checked three-letter solutions.

Read more >>

Financial Times 18,156 by PETO

I was sailing through today’s puzzle from Peto when I hit a brick wall of noncomprehension on the last four clues, which took me as long to solve and parse as all the rest put together. I think I have successfully explained everything in the end.

Read more >>