PeterO

Born 1944. I was introduced to cryptics, mainly the Telegraph, in the sixth form, as a group effort. This continued through college (physics), and after, but more sporadically after I moved to the US forty years ago. Now I am semi-retired from programming - I drive school buses - I have time to troll the internet for crosswords to my heart's content. I regularly do the Guardian, Independent FT and Private Eye. Despite rather regular entries to Private Eye and the Guardian Genius, the nearest I have come to winning anything was on a book publishers' website, a crossword compiled by Eddie James, I think. As the prizes included a bottle of Champagne, to avoid customs problems, I entered in my brother-in-law's name. He was somewhat surprised to win.

Guardian Cryptic N° 25,685 by Pasquale

Wed July 11, 2012 at 2:22 am by PeterO

I would put this at the easier end of the Guardian spectrum; the clue constructions are generally straightforward, with finely crafted surfaces. All in all, just the kind of puzzle that I an happy to see when it is my turn to blog. Thank you, Pasquale.

Financial Times N° 14,047 by Cinephile

Fri September 7, 2012 at 1:00 pmWed July 4, 2012 at 3:30 am by PeterO

When I volunteered to fill in for PeeDee, I did not realize that I was down for the Guardian as well – nor, of course, that I would be served up with Cinephile and Arachne. I have managed to digest this embarras des richesses. I hope it sits well with me in the morning.

Guardian Cryptic N° 25,679 by Arachne

Wed July 4, 2012 at 3:35 amWed July 4, 2012 at 2:27 am by PeterO

A masterly (mistressly?) offering from the Spider Lady.

Everyman N° 3,429 (24 June 2012)

Sun July 1, 2012 at 3:51 amSun July 1, 2012 at 12:01 am by PeterO

This time Everyman’s vocabulary has returned to normal.

Guardian Cryptic N° 25,675 by Araucaria

Fri June 29, 2012 at 5:21 am by PeterO

Here we have the wide range of references and creative clueing typical of Araucaria. Like yesterday’s Crucible. the puzzle is liberally sprinkled with envelopes. And it surely can be described as colourful. Across … Read more >>

Guardian Cryptic N° 25,669 by Tramp

Fri June 22, 2012 at 12:52 pmFri June 22, 2012 at 4:22 am by PeterO

I found this quite difficult.

Guardian Quiptic N° 657, by Moley

Mon June 18, 2012 at 2:00 pmMon June 18, 2012 at 2:51 am by PeterO

Moley gives us a pleasant variety of devices clueing mostly familiar word – which fills the Quiptic description very adequately. Across 7. Tribunal to convey suit (9) COURTSHIP A charace of COURT (‘tribunal’) … Read more >>

Guardian Cryptic N° 25,661 by Arachne

Wed June 13, 2012 at 3:25 am by PeterO

This has given me some difficulties.

Guardian Cryptic N° 25,655 by Brendan

Wed June 6, 2012 at 9:31 pmWed June 6, 2012 at 2:59 am by PeterO

I found that this one went in very smoothly.

Everyman N° 3,425 (27 May 2012)

Sun June 3, 2012 at 12:01 am by PeterO

I seem to detect a range of clue devices a little more limited than usual for Everyman, but the smooth surfaces are par for the course.

Guardian Cryptic N° 25,651 by Orlando

Fri June 1, 2012 at 11:20 amFri June 1, 2012 at 3:11 am by PeterO

I found this a bit of a struggle, but it yielded in the end, with the bottom half going in first. Across 1. Engineer in a car plant (6) ARNICA An anagram (‘engineer’) … Read more >>

Guardian Cryptic N° 25,645 by Araucaria

Fri May 25, 2012 at 1:53 pmFri May 25, 2012 at 4:38 am by PeterO

A typically delightful offering from Araucaria.

Guardian Quiptic N° 653, by Arachne

Mon May 21, 2012 at 3:44 pmMon May 21, 2012 at 2:45 pm by PeterO

Apologies for the late blog; I failed to note it was my turn until the last minute.

Guardian Cryptic N° 25,637 by Paul

Wed May 16, 2012 at 1:02 pmWed May 16, 2012 at 2:15 am by PeterO

This shows Paul’s characteristic inventiveness in wordplay; fortunately I seem to be close to his wavelength. Across 1. See 15 – See 15 4. Fiddle with good seafood (6) SCAMPI A charade of … Read more >>

Guardian Cryptic N° 25,631 by Bonxie

Thu May 10, 2012 at 2:15 pmWed May 9, 2012 at 2:52 am by PeterO

I put this mostly at the easier end of the spectrum, but none the less pleasing for that; but in reviewing the writeup, I see that I found quite a number of the answers required special comment or explanatory link .