Archive for the 'Guardian Genius' Category
Posted by bridgesong on 2nd August 2010
I found this easier than some recent Genius puzzles. There was only one obscure word and most of the clues were fairly straightforward.
The requirement here was to identify how the answers to ten clues should be shortened. I fairly soon identified that we were talking about cards, as king ten and queen were to be omitted, but it took far too long for me (a bridge player!) to work out that 10 across was Yarborough, a hand of 13 cards containing no cards higher than the nine. In fact, although the instructions do not say so, there were two of each kind of card omitted (shown in brackets). Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 9 Comments »
Posted by bridgesong on 6th July 2010
This month’s theme involved removing words from a number of across clues and then putting anagrams of them in some of the down clues. Two further unclued entries were to be found by taking the initial letters of the missing or redundant words. I found the easiest way to start was by looking for words that didn’t appear to belong, and seeing if they could form anagrams.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 4 Comments »
Posted by mhl on 6th June 2010
We found it tough to get going with this puzzle, but once we’d got the theme of 7-letter characters from Shakespeare, and, I’m afraid to say, resorted to using Wikipedia’s lists from A to K and L to Z, progress was pretty quick. The 20 of these themed answers are packed into the grid with impressive density. In some senses it wasn’t too hard to guess the answers for this puzzle, but there are quite a number (particularly in the South East corner) where the clues were very difficult to parse. I’m indebted to Gaufrid and others for suggesting readings for some of these clues.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 32 Comments »
Posted by jetdoc on 2nd May 2010
An entertaining puzzle from Lavatch — and not too difficult once you spotted what was happening. Where a clash occurred, you needed to 1a,25 — use the letter alphabetically half-way between the two clashing ones; in each case, this gave two new real words. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 10 Comments »
Posted by duncanshiell on 4th April 2010
It’s nearly a year since I blogged a Genius and it clearly hasn’t got any easier. This one took me an age to get into, but eventually I got a chink of light and began plodding away to completion.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 8 Comments »
Posted by Andrew on 28th February 2010
I struggled with this puzzle when I first tried it, though getting enough down answers to guess that they all had one or more Bs missing. Then I left it for a couple of weeks, lost my original copy, and when I tried again I got through it in a single session. This was just after I’d blogged Puck’s contraversial SpongeBob Squarepants puzzle, so perhaps I was more attuned to Puckishness. The theme is rather cryptically explained in the preamble: “Down solutions must be suitably 14 (TAILORED) in order to be 17, not briefly edited, (BLESSED less ED, so “B-LESS”) before being inserted in the grid.” The last sentence (“Three across clues have solutions that are 17 (BLESSED) and are not further defined.”) refers to three items from the Beatitudes, “Blessed are the Peacemakers/Meek/Pure of heart” (but not the Cheesemakers). In the solutions below I’ve shown the the unmodified version of the downs. The entries in the diagram have the letter B removed wherever it occurs.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 6 Comments »
Posted by jetdoc on 1st February 2010
Oops! I should have assigned this for blogging, but have been somewhat preoccupied. So here’s a very quick, last-minute attempt at a blog. The deadline was orginally given as 6 February, but the solution is already available on the Guardian website.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 11 Comments »
Posted by jetdoc on 1st February 2010
I have now published the blog — see above.
Posted in Guardian Genius | 2 Comments »
Posted by jetdoc on 4th January 2010
As Geniuses go, this was on the easy side — the preamble was explicit about what needed to be done, and the clues were pretty straightforward. For those who missed the preamble, which apparently was missing at first, it said: ‘Nine solutions must be converted into a contradictory word with the same number of letters before entry into the grid’.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 8 Comments »
Posted by Andrew on 7th December 2009
Four symphonies with nicknames provide the theme for this puzzle: the undefined anagrams lead to the composer (with a missing letter) and the nickname. The “clue of sorts” given by the missing letter is that its position is the number of the symphony: for example, the Eroica is Beethoven’s 3rd, so the 3rd letter of BEETHOVEN is omitted (of course it’s hard to tell in that example!) Perhaps surprisingly, the four symphonies involve only two numbers: two thirds and two fourths. The normal clues were mostly straightforward (in contrast to the ferociously hard Araucaria puzzle last month), with just a couple of obscure answers causing some difficulties, though even they were guessable thanks to Pasquale’s usual sound clueing.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 12 Comments »
Posted by bridgesong on 1st November 2009
I found this extremely tough, unlike some of the earlier offerings in the Genius series. I still have a problem explaining a few of the clues. The main difficulty was simply the obscurity of some of the words used, with less help than usual from checking letters because of the nature of the puzzle. Only a few clues were numbered; others had to be inserted where they would fit, like an alphabetical jigsaw. This aspect didn’t prove too difficult, although I didn’t understand why the instructions referred to clues having “their indicated place at the table”. For a while I thought that there might be some food-related theme but if so, I still can’t see it. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 16 Comments »
Posted by michod on 4th October 2009
This felt a little like a puzzle designed to test out a thematic entry technique. The clues were good, and the process of making new words by moving one letter produced some intriguing results and was, in some cases, surprisingly hard to spot. But at the end of it the moved letters spelt out ’redistribution’, which, while an accurate description of what one had done, was slightly underwhelming as a final step. Original answers first.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | No Comments »
Posted by Andrew on 6th September 2009
A tough challenge from Paul that took me several sessions to complete, though looking back at it now there’s not much that seems particularly obscure or difficult. The crucial 8dn was actually one of the last clues I solved, but I worked out the gimmick – that alternate rows of across answers are entered from right to left – from finding that the answers were the right length for the spaces, but didn’t match the crossing letters.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 7 Comments »
Posted by jetdoc on 2nd August 2009
A Genius of average difficulty from Pasquale. Once I had spotted how it worked, I solved it without problems. Having mislaid my solved copy, I had to do it again, and got through it pretty rapidly second time around.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian, Guardian Genius | 7 Comments »
Posted by Gaufrid on 5th July 2009
This was, I think, the hardest Genius puzzle since the Guardian site became freely available. I only managed to solve just over a third of the clues in the first session and then got a few more each day during the next couple of days or so when revisiting the puzzle. Being able to make a start on grid entry would have been greatly helped by solving 5d but I did not get this one until much later.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 7 Comments »
Posted by duncanshiell on 31st May 2009
This was a entertaining, but aggressive crossword that took longer than it should have because I had the wrong answer at 18d (KEG) for a while. I thought to begin with that 18d was TUN (a large cask, sounds like [say] a ton weight), so I was wondering about the meaning of the middle letters of ACCRINGTON STANLEY for some time. Eventually the penny dropped and the words PEN, POCKET, STANLEY and BREAD made some sense, following on from the one unadjusted across answer at 16a GET THE KNIVES OUT. All types of knives had to be removed from the other across answers to make them fit the grid. I think that all the various knives were well known.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 10 Comments »
Posted by tilsit on 8th May 2009
Apologies for being late with this.
A really enjoyable challenge from Brummie formed the April Genius puzzle and one which required wits to be kept about one at all times.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 2 Comments »
Posted by mhl on 6th April 2009
I found this to be the toughest Genius in a while, but very satisfying to solve. In each of the clues which must be changed, I have listed the clued answer first and then the version which should be entered into the grid. The changed letters spell out THE METAMOROPHOSIS and the letters across the middle line spell out GREGOR, so the question was whether to change that to BEETLE or INSECT. The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations has “insect” in its translation of the first line.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 5 Comments »
Posted by Gaufrid on 4th March 2009
I am standing in at the last moment so it is now over a month since I completed this puzzle and therefore I don’t remember too much about the detail, though writing the blog has brought back some pleasant memories. What I do recall though is that, as usual, it was an enjoyable puzzle from Paul.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 7 Comments »
Posted by mhl on 2nd February 2009
The hidden theme of this excellent crossword is “Composers”: most uses of the letter C in the clues should be read as “composer” for the clue to make sense. This perhaps wasn’t as tricky as the last couple of Genius puzzles, but a good challenge nonetheless. (To give credit where it’s due, solving this was a joint effort between me and my partner.) Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 2 Comments »
Posted by jetdoc on 5th January 2009
I found this puzzle fun to do, once I got the hang of how it worked. In each across clue, the definition gives a word containing either ASS, PIG, EWE or CAT; the subsidiary part gives a non-word (in most cases) with a different one of the animals; before writing it in the grid, you need to change the animal yet again.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 8 Comments »
Posted by duncanshiell on 1st December 2008
Another BOB DYLAN crossword, overlapping a recent Listener, although I am not sure why the focus was on Dylan in November. It’s not his birthday nor any other particular anniversary that I can detect.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 2 Comments »
Posted by Andrew on 3rd November 2008
After two very tough offerings from Paul and Brummie, this required very little genius in either solving the clues or fitting the answers into the grid. An enjoyable enough puzzle, and a clever feat of construction, but rather a disappointment from a solver’s point of view. I very quickly solved all but a few of the clues, and found there was only one possible way to fit the 11-letter answers into the grid. After that filling in the rest and solving the remaining clues was a formality. Hugh Stephenson’s newsletter bemoans the fact that there were very few entries for September’s Genius, despite it being the first under the free service: I suspect there may be quite a lot more for this one.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 8 Comments »
Posted by michod on 6th October 2008
As a newcomer to the Genius since the site went free, I found this OK but a little – not hard to get going with, but tough to finish because the entry method for the thematic clues, though good, left you with the kind of ambiguities a definiton-only puzzle would (I love cryptics, they;re so much easier!) . The final curtain, as it were, was little underwhelming, and I felt that the whole synonym idea could have been deployed to better purpose. The eight thematic clues are asterisked, two theme words in bold.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 6 Comments »
Posted by bridgesong on 1st September 2008
Although I’ve been a subscriber to the Guardian crossword website for some years now, this
is the first time that I’ve attempted a Genius crossword. Having managed to complete this
one without too much difficulty (with one exception) I’m kicking myself for not having done
them previously. Solving time was about a day (not spent exclusively on it).
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian Genius | 3 Comments »