<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 24386/Rufus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fifteensquared.net/2008/05/12/guardian-24386rufus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/05/12/guardian-24386rufus/</link>
	<description>All your clue are belong to us</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/05/12/guardian-24386rufus/#comment-25842</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 22:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1533#comment-25842</guid>
		<description>Yes Eileen, but patients do complain of their complaints. I agree with that Andrew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Eileen, but patients do complain of their complaints. I agree with that Andrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smutchin</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/05/12/guardian-24386rufus/#comment-25839</link>
		<dc:creator>smutchin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 22:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1533#comment-25839</guid>
		<description>For 22ac, I was looking too hard for a non-naval meaning of "bay" and, having the W in place, decided the second word must be "window"...

I guessed 10ac but didn't know that meaning of "jolly". I liked the definition though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For 22ac, I was looking too hard for a non-naval meaning of &#8220;bay&#8221; and, having the W in place, decided the second word must be &#8220;window&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>I guessed 10ac but didn&#8217;t know that meaning of &#8220;jolly&#8221;. I liked the definition though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/05/12/guardian-24386rufus/#comment-25805</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1533#comment-25805</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Andrew. Yes, I realised as soon as I'd posted the comment that you had got it.  Dictionaries do give 'complaint' as having the two distinct meanings of 'grievance' and 'ailment'. I thought it was ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Andrew. Yes, I realised as soon as I&#8217;d posted the comment that you had got it.  Dictionaries do give &#8216;complaint&#8217; as having the two distinct meanings of &#8216;grievance&#8217; and &#8216;ailment&#8217;. I thought it was ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/05/12/guardian-24386rufus/#comment-25801</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1533#comment-25801</guid>
		<description>Eileen - yes, I got 27ac. I just thought it was rather a weak clue, COMPLAIN and COMPLAINT being so closely related.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eileen - yes, I got 27ac. I just thought it was rather a weak clue, COMPLAIN and COMPLAINT being so closely related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/05/12/guardian-24386rufus/#comment-25770</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1533#comment-25770</guid>
		<description>27ac: COMPLAIN[t]

29ac Yes, ensigns and gallants are both flags, and also people, hence the comments at 4 and 5 re similarity of clues</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>27ac: COMPLAIN[t]</p>
<p>29ac Yes, ensigns and gallants are both flags, and also people, hence the comments at 4 and 5 re similarity of clues</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/05/12/guardian-24386rufus/#comment-25765</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1533#comment-25765</guid>
		<description>For some reason I found this a lot harder going than usual for Rufus, even apart from the slightly obscure naval references. No one has yet mentioned 27ac, which I thought was a bit unsatisfactory.

29ac - I presume this refers to flags (e.g. the White Ensign) which could conceivably be said to climb ("run up") masts, as well as the Naval rank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason I found this a lot harder going than usual for Rufus, even apart from the slightly obscure naval references. No one has yet mentioned 27ac, which I thought was a bit unsatisfactory.</p>
<p>29ac - I presume this refers to flags (e.g. the White Ensign) which could conceivably be said to climb (&#8221;run up&#8221;) masts, as well as the Naval rank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muck</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/05/12/guardian-24386rufus/#comment-25733</link>
		<dc:creator>muck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1533#comment-25733</guid>
		<description>3dn GALLANTS: I have the defn as 'adventurous men', 'of old' meaning an obsolete word: the top-gallants were among the highest sails on the old square-rigged ships.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3dn GALLANTS: I have the defn as &#8216;adventurous men&#8217;, &#8216;of old&#8217; meaning an obsolete word: the top-gallants were among the highest sails on the old square-rigged ships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/05/12/guardian-24386rufus/#comment-25724</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Blackburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1533#comment-25724</guid>
		<description>I checked earlier and it's not listed under Tim Moorey's excellent list of indicators in Chambers Crossword Dictionary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked earlier and it&#8217;s not listed under Tim Moorey&#8217;s excellent list of indicators in Chambers Crossword Dictionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/05/12/guardian-24386rufus/#comment-25723</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1533#comment-25723</guid>
		<description>As part of my quest for some kind of life I limited my inquiries to Chambers Online, but 'capacity' has to be a bit rum. 

You'll be relieved to hear it's still a noun um, except when it's a adjective (well, sort of modifying noun) but since 'capacity' as in crowd seems to be all you can get, at best it's a bit like 'potential' - this is used fairly frequently as a post-positional nounal jobby. I regret to inform that I've never been convinced.

Even in Ruth Crisp, whose generally excellent list of anagrams (in her wicked book ISBN 0-340-57398-8) contains a few of these, neither hide nor hair of capacity is seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As part of my quest for some kind of life I limited my inquiries to Chambers Online, but &#8216;capacity&#8217; has to be a bit rum. </p>
<p>You&#8217;ll be relieved to hear it&#8217;s still a noun um, except when it&#8217;s a adjective (well, sort of modifying noun) but since &#8216;capacity&#8217; as in crowd seems to be all you can get, at best it&#8217;s a bit like &#8216;potential&#8217; - this is used fairly frequently as a post-positional nounal jobby. I regret to inform that I&#8217;ve never been convinced.</p>
<p>Even in Ruth Crisp, whose generally excellent list of anagrams (in her wicked book ISBN 0-340-57398-8) contains a few of these, neither hide nor hair of capacity is seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulW</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/05/12/guardian-24386rufus/#comment-25607</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 09:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=1533#comment-25607</guid>
		<description>I have never seen CAPACITY used as an anagram indicator and I wonder what the compiler really intended. RANDOM would have done nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never seen CAPACITY used as an anagram indicator and I wonder what the compiler really intended. RANDOM would have done nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
