<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inquisitor #65 CLASSIFIED by Ploy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Jones</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-19341</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-19341</guid>
		<description>Great puzzle - I see Ray Parry-Morris is keeping up his winning streak. The new Eddie Looby ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great puzzle - I see Ray Parry-Morris is keeping up his winning streak. The new Eddie Looby ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hihoba</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-18734</link>
		<dc:creator>Hihoba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-18734</guid>
		<description>Great Testy! Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Testy! Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testy</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-18727</link>
		<dc:creator>Testy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-18727</guid>
		<description>The French "who"=QUI  must leave "get"=ACQUIRE, which leaves ACRE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The French &#8220;who&#8221;=QUI  must leave &#8220;get&#8221;=ACQUIRE, which leaves ACRE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hihoba</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-18719</link>
		<dc:creator>Hihoba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-18719</guid>
		<description>"The French who must leave get a measure of land." - ACRE is the measure of land, but can you explain the rest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The French who must leave get a measure of land.&#8221; - ACRE is the measure of land, but can you explain the rest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick H</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-18712</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-18712</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, that was what I meant - two words then. What was the clue to 27dn?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, that was what I meant - two words then. What was the clue to 27dn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hihoba</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-18704</link>
		<dc:creator>Hihoba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-18704</guid>
		<description>Don't think there was anything to highlight other Whyte Notation. Anyone got a solution to the wordplay for 27D?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t think there was anything to highlight other Whyte Notation. Anyone got a solution to the wordplay for 27D?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick H</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-18702</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/04/08/inquisitor-65-classified-by-ploy/#comment-18702</guid>
		<description>And there were also three thematic words to highlight, weren't there? I think I found them in the end, but couldn't quite bring myself to work out the three-digit combinations - I plead guilty to crossword obsession and a bit of bad birdwatching, but my anorak doesn't have room in it for locomotive wheel combinations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And there were also three thematic words to highlight, weren&#8217;t there? I think I found them in the end, but couldn&#8217;t quite bring myself to work out the three-digit combinations - I plead guilty to crossword obsession and a bit of bad birdwatching, but my anorak doesn&#8217;t have room in it for locomotive wheel combinations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
