<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 6670 by Punk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-16004</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-16004</guid>
		<description>Testing - can't post in Virgilius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testing - can&#8217;t post in Virgilius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Ransome</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15954</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Ransome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15954</guid>
		<description>COSMETIC SURGEON

"ET in Cosmic + surge + on": not quite I think; isn't it "ET in Cosmic + s(tudio) + urge + on"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>COSMETIC SURGEON</p>
<p>&#8220;ET in Cosmic + surge + on&#8221;: not quite I think; isn&#8217;t it &#8220;ET in Cosmic + s(tudio) + urge + on&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill and Tamzin</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15932</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill and Tamzin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15932</guid>
		<description>We could do the Guardian and the Indy today, and they were very different.

This was the best, with Essex giel making us laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We could do the Guardian and the Indy today, and they were very different.</p>
<p>This was the best, with Essex giel making us laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eimi</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15929</link>
		<dc:creator>eimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15929</guid>
		<description>Whether technically correct or not, a quick trawl of classical music magazines and record companies shows that ops is a fairly common abbreviation for more than one distinct musical work. It seems that few people in the real world use opera to mean the plural of opus rather than a musical form. Presumably, as a music graduate, Punk is on fairly safe ground here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether technically correct or not, a quick trawl of classical music magazines and record companies shows that ops is a fairly common abbreviation for more than one distinct musical work. It seems that few people in the real world use opera to mean the plural of opus rather than a musical form. Presumably, as a music graduate, Punk is on fairly safe ground here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15928</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15928</guid>
		<description>You can still argue that more than one cryptic element OP (for OPUS) are OPS, and so justify WORKS.

(Thanks by the way Punk, for that fiver.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can still argue that more than one cryptic element OP (for OPUS) are OPS, and so justify WORKS.</p>
<p>(Thanks by the way Punk, for that fiver.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NealH</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15926</link>
		<dc:creator>NealH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15926</guid>
		<description>Could it not be short for operations ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it not be short for operations ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick H</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15925</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15925</guid>
		<description>There was a lot to like here, including 12ac, but one small thing I'd query was 'works' for OPS in 4down. I'm no expert on Latin or music, but the plural of op (opus) is not ops, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a lot to like here, including 12ac, but one small thing I&#8217;d query was &#8216;works&#8217; for OPS in 4down. I&#8217;m no expert on Latin or music, but the plural of op (opus) is not ops, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15920</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15920</guid>
		<description>LOCUST   I think what's meant is that T is the twentieth letter in the alphabet.   I found this very hard, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOCUST   I think what&#8217;s meant is that T is the twentieth letter in the alphabet.   I found this very hard, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NealH</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15916</link>
		<dc:creator>NealH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15916</guid>
		<description>Fortunately, I was doing the paper version on a train, so didn't have reveal available.   Otherwise, I might have been tempted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately, I was doing the paper version on a train, so didn&#8217;t have reveal available.   Otherwise, I might have been tempted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15915</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/03/03/independent-6670-by-punk/#comment-15915</guid>
		<description>According to:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/teachers/literacy_7_11/word/newsid_3877000/3877313.stm

'Tiggerish' is in the Oxford Dictionary, 11th edition.

V difficult today - managed half before moving to the on-line reveal button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/teachers/literacy_7_11/word/newsid_3877000/3877313.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/teachers/literacy_7_11/word/newsid_3877000/3877313.stm</a></p>
<p>&#8216;Tiggerish&#8217; is in the Oxford Dictionary, 11th edition.</p>
<p>V difficult today - managed half before moving to the on-line reveal button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
