<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 6642/Dac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fifteensquared.net/2008/01/30/independent-6642dac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/01/30/independent-6642dac/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Palmer</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/01/30/independent-6642dac/#comment-12975</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/01/30/independent-6642dac/#comment-12975</guid>
		<description>John queries the use oh 'wheel' to denote O.  I'm not too keen on indicating letters by things of the same shape, but this is just a matter of taste and there is nothing unsound about it. I was much more concerned about the use of 'ball' to denote O in 1D.  I don't see how a 3-dimensional object can be considered equivalent to a 2-dimensional one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John queries the use oh &#8216;wheel&#8217; to denote O.  I&#8217;m not too keen on indicating letters by things of the same shape, but this is just a matter of taste and there is nothing unsound about it. I was much more concerned about the use of &#8216;ball&#8217; to denote O in 1D.  I don&#8217;t see how a 3-dimensional object can be considered equivalent to a 2-dimensional one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neildubya</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/01/30/independent-6642dac/#comment-12931</link>
		<dc:creator>neildubya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/01/30/independent-6642dac/#comment-12931</guid>
		<description>Enjoyed this one a lot. I knew 10a but couldn't work out all of the wordplay straight away so waited a while before filling it in. 7d was a guess for me but a reasonably confident one. I was also suprised by the Thur reference in 15d.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed this one a lot. I knew 10a but couldn&#8217;t work out all of the wordplay straight away so waited a while before filling it in. 7d was a guess for me but a reasonably confident one. I was also suprised by the Thur reference in 15d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/01/30/independent-6642dac/#comment-12925</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/01/30/independent-6642dac/#comment-12925</guid>
		<description>Made a right mess of this one, I'm afraid. A lot of unfamiliar words meant I struggled. I usually start with the anagrams and work from there - but couldn't quite untangle either 28ac or 11d, which with the other problems left me with large gaps I couldn't fill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Made a right mess of this one, I&#8217;m afraid. A lot of unfamiliar words meant I struggled. I usually start with the anagrams and work from there - but couldn&#8217;t quite untangle either 28ac or 11d, which with the other problems left me with large gaps I couldn&#8217;t fill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2008/01/30/independent-6642dac/#comment-12918</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2008/01/30/independent-6642dac/#comment-12918</guid>
		<description>TOSTADO   A new word to me, but I think yr explanation is right ie. S = small (as in clothes sizes) TOT "goes without"   ADO.   Not too difficult a puzzle, but good as always from Dac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TOSTADO   A new word to me, but I think yr explanation is right ie. S = small (as in clothes sizes) TOT &#8220;goes without&#8221;   ADO.   Not too difficult a puzzle, but good as always from Dac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
