Archive for January, 2008
Posted by ilancaron on 31st January 2008
Well-phrased wordplay and clues on the whole. I struggled with several, to my mind, esoteric refs (SQUEERS, OSBERT, TREVELYAN) but I’m sure someone better educated (in Britain!) than myself would not have been challenged.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | 9 Comments »
Posted by nmsindy on 31st January 2008
I found this a very tough puzzle, esp the lower half but also the long 20-letter phrase in the top half which was new to me. But I got there in the end and there were some excellent clues. Solving time, 61 mins.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 12 Comments »
Posted by nmsindy on 31st January 2008
A little harder than usual from Quixote, I found. Solving time, 31 mins.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | No Comments »
Posted by Pete Maclean on 31st January 2008
A fairly routine puzzle from Mudd here. I completed it fairly quickly because I found the clues for the three long answers easy. Still, 11A and 5D took some puzzling over.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | No Comments »
Posted by linxit on 30th January 2008
Blimey, that was tough! It didn’t help that I’m nursing a hangover from last night (beer tasting event) but I think I’d have struggled anyway. Took about 45 minutes, but I had to use reference books to finish it.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | 11 Comments »
Posted by John on 30th January 2008
One of Dac’s easier puzzles I think, but none the worse for that. Consistently excellent clueing as usual. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 4 Comments »
Posted by Colin Blackburn on 29th January 2008
An absolutely superb Brendan. Many of the clues were outstanding, in fact the weaker ones were the thematic clues. The theme was a rambling one connecting John DONNE (10) and Ernest HEMINGWAY (14) starting from the ISLE OF MAN (9). Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | 7 Comments »
Posted by neildubya on 29th January 2008
Another thematic tour-de-force from Virgilius; this time almost every clue or answer has a royal flavour to it. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 9 Comments »
Posted by michod on 28th January 2008
As Bob Marley used to sing, though I don’t think that’s what he put in his cylinders. That one at 8down’s my favourite cryptic definition in a mixed bag. Overall, though I think the best clues are the very economic charades/containers like 2dn, 17ac and 24ac, rather than the CDs and anagrams.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | 5 Comments »
Posted by NealH on 28th January 2008
Initially I thought this was going to be very easy. I got through most of the clues fairly quickly but then got hopelessly stuck on 8 across, 25 across and 24 down, some of which was self-inflicted because I’d incorrectly written “plot” for 2 down.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 6 Comments »
Posted by linxit on 27th January 2008
Solving time 47:10, with one clue left (which I eventually got while writing this blog entry).
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Azed | 2 Comments »
Posted by rightback on 26th January 2008
Solving time: Gave up on 10ac and 7dn after 18 mins, with 9dn also wrong.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | 2 Comments »
Posted by petebiddlecombe on 26th January 2008
This post is a short guide to Independent and FT cryptic crosswords for those trying them out in their new free online forms. It’s particularly directed at any US-based solvers who haven’t seen these particular puzzles before. (It started out as a guide for the Indie ones, but then I remembered that the FT puzzles are currently available for free too. The information about FT puzzles is less detailed, as I’ve never been a regular FT solver myself.)
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT, Independent, Tips for solvers | 17 Comments »
Posted by tilsit on 25th January 2008
Pirouetting into sight today is Phi with a puzzle containing some well-known (and not so well-known) ballets.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 10 Comments »
Posted by michod on 25th January 2008
Easier than it looked at first glance. Some nice clues, with concise and convincing surfaces. One or two slightly loose definitions, but I guess you can put that down to 8down!
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | 5 Comments »
Posted by neildubya on 25th January 2008
Having just blogged Nimrod’s Thursday puzzle (6637) I can say that I found this one the easier of the two. I’m not really a big fan of long anagrams and I was lucky to get the two here reasonably early on. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 3 Comments »
Posted by Hihoba on 25th January 2008
This was a corker!! I’m still not completely convinced that we’ve got it right, but here goes.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Inquisitor | 6 Comments »
Posted by smiffy on 25th January 2008
As one has come to expect from Bradman (or any other of his pseuDONyms), flawless technical merit receives a healthy dollop of creative/lateral thinking. ‘Twas ever thus, it seems.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | 1 Comment »
Posted by neildubya on 24th January 2008
Some clever grid construction here as one phrase appears twice in the grid and there’s a Nina too (see 5a below for an explanation). I found this quite hard going in places – I guessed a few answers and I couldn’t get 27a at all. I also don’t understand 28a. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 16 Comments »
Posted by neildubya on 24th January 2008
As previous discussed, I’m not a nature-boy, but ”False Acacia” seems a tad obscure - oh well, thanks for the Botany lesson, Brummie. Otherwise quite a blood-thirsty set of clues todays with some great wordplay.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | 8 Comments »
Posted by nmsindy on 24th January 2008
Some unusual words made this one a little harder for me than some recently from Quixote.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | No Comments »
Posted by Pete Maclean on 24th January 2008
A moderately easy and thoroughly splendid offering from Cincinnus this week. It is a bit heavy on double-definition clues but there’s nothing wrong with that especially since only one of them is a plain and simple example; the others are decidedly clever.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | 3 Comments »
Posted by ilancaron on 23rd January 2008
A classic Paulene challenge though no Araucarian cross-refs nor complex multi-word anagrams. But still some charming and clever clues… as per usual I always feel entertained and gratified having solved Paul. Lots of clever cryptic definitions and allusions in the wordplay.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | 6 Comments »
Posted by neildubya on 23rd January 2008
The cryptic puzzle is here and the concise/simple puzzle is here.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 5 Comments »
Posted by nmsindy on 23rd January 2008
This had everything you could ask from a daily cryptic from this top setter. Excellent misdirection, great variety, and all with everyday words. Flawless construction. Solving time, 25 mins.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 5 Comments »