<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beelzebub 916/Phi (02-09-07)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fifteensquared.net/2007/09/14/beelzebub-916phi-02-09-07/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2007/09/14/beelzebub-916phi-02-09-07/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: petebiddlecombe</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2007/09/14/beelzebub-916phi-02-09-07/#comment-4626</link>
		<dc:creator>petebiddlecombe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 05:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2007/09/14/beelzebub-916phi-02-09-07/#comment-4626</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Chanorak section: MUZZ is in C 2003 as a back-formation from MUZZY.  A bit disappointingly, a *fauna search in the CD-ROM version doesn't find a whole sequence of words ranking animals by size in mm, just micro- (not visible with the naked eye), macro- (visible ...), and mega- (visible and 'large'). (Plus others based on habitat or membership - do we really need both epi- and in- ?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Multi-word answers: I think it's just because full enumeration gives you a bit too much help.  Seeing (6,2,3,4) in a 15x15, I'm looking for MIDDLE OF THE ROAD immediately, closely followed by other IN THE or OF THE options.  US-style solvers cope without any enumerations, which can lead to some fine kick-self moments.  The one I remember best: "Hockey game starter" for a 7-letter entry.  I racked my brains for the ice-hockey version of 'bully off', and then felt increasingly baffled as the checking letters came in. Answer:  O Canada&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chanorak section: MUZZ is in C 2003 as a back-formation from MUZZY.  A bit disappointingly, a *fauna search in the CD-ROM version doesn&#8217;t find a whole sequence of words ranking animals by size in mm, just micro- (not visible with the naked eye), macro- (visible &#8230;), and mega- (visible and &#8216;large&#8217;). (Plus others based on habitat or membership - do we really need both epi- and in- ?)</p>
<p>Multi-word answers: I think it&#8217;s just because full enumeration gives you a bit too much help.  Seeing (6,2,3,4) in a 15&#215;15, I&#8217;m looking for MIDDLE OF THE ROAD immediately, closely followed by other IN THE or OF THE options.  US-style solvers cope without any enumerations, which can lead to some fine kick-self moments.  The one I remember best: &#8220;Hockey game starter&#8221; for a 7-letter entry.  I racked my brains for the ice-hockey version of &#8216;bully off&#8217;, and then felt increasingly baffled as the checking letters came in. Answer:  O Canada</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2007/09/14/beelzebub-916phi-02-09-07/#comment-4597</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Blackburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2007/09/14/beelzebub-916phi-02-09-07/#comment-4597</guid>
		<description>Is 19d TH' + AM + MUZ(z)?

I can find MUZZY meaning blurred in Chambers 1998 so I guess MUZZ meaning blur is in one of the dictionaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is 19d TH&#8217; + AM + MUZ(z)?</p>
<p>I can find MUZZY meaning blurred in Chambers 1998 so I guess MUZZ meaning blur is in one of the dictionaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
