<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Observer Azed 1834: Overlaps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/29/observer-azed-1834-overlaps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/29/observer-azed-1834-overlaps/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jetdoc</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/29/observer-azed-1834-overlaps/#comment-3347</link>
		<dc:creator>jetdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/29/observer-azed-1834-overlaps/#comment-3347</guid>
		<description>I just checked Peter’s blog of the previous week’s Azed, and I see why I thought orles were somehow familiar. This is one of those Chambers definitions that somehow raises more questions than it answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just checked Peter’s blog of the previous week’s Azed, and I see why I thought orles were somehow familiar. This is one of those Chambers definitions that somehow raises more questions than it answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jetdoc</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/29/observer-azed-1834-overlaps/#comment-3339</link>
		<dc:creator>jetdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/29/observer-azed-1834-overlaps/#comment-3339</guid>
		<description>Thanks.

Silly (lazy, anyway) of me not to get SHEVAT.

Now I remember the full wordplay for 24A — I got it when I first solved it, but couldn’t remember when I came to blog it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Silly (lazy, anyway) of me not to get SHEVAT.</p>
<p>Now I remember the full wordplay for 24A — I got it when I first solved it, but couldn’t remember when I came to blog it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: linxit</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/29/observer-azed-1834-overlaps/#comment-3333</link>
		<dc:creator>linxit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 22:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/29/observer-azed-1834-overlaps/#comment-3333</guid>
		<description>Yes, nice puzzle. When I read the preamble I thought it would turn out trickier than was the case.

Thanks for explaining the wordplay for TEATIME and ROUNDLE, I didn't manage to work them out. I can explain 24A though - it's wordplay in between the two definitions, which is a strange way of constructing a clue...ALA = "expansion section" + S(mall).

4D - I had SHEVAT, which is an alternative spelling for SHEBAT, and explains the "large vessel".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, nice puzzle. When I read the preamble I thought it would turn out trickier than was the case.</p>
<p>Thanks for explaining the wordplay for TEATIME and ROUNDLE, I didn&#8217;t manage to work them out. I can explain 24A though - it&#8217;s wordplay in between the two definitions, which is a strange way of constructing a clue&#8230;ALA = &#8220;expansion section&#8221; + S(mall).</p>
<p>4D - I had SHEVAT, which is an alternative spelling for SHEBAT, and explains the &#8220;large vessel&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petebiddlecombe</title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/29/observer-azed-1834-overlaps/#comment-3329</link>
		<dc:creator>petebiddlecombe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/2007/07/29/observer-azed-1834-overlaps/#comment-3329</guid>
		<description>Also thought this was a good puzzle.  As STATIST was my first answer, it was handy to get a definite ST in the middle of the top row.  For some reason, the puzzle got filled in very much from top to bottom.  I wonder whether it's significant that the outside down entries are both "horsey".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also thought this was a good puzzle.  As STATIST was my first answer, it was handy to get a definite ST in the middle of the top row.  For some reason, the puzzle got filled in very much from top to bottom.  I wonder whether it&#8217;s significant that the outside down entries are both &#8220;horsey&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
