<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 23937/Pasquale - pretty tough for a weekday puzzle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fifteensquared.net/2006/11/30/guardian-23937pasquale-pretty-tough-for-a-weekday-puzzle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2006/11/30/guardian-23937pasquale-pretty-tough-for-a-weekday-puzzle/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Pasquale]]></title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2006/11/30/guardian-23937pasquale-pretty-tough-for-a-weekday-puzzle/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pasquale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=90#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all the feedback. It was mine in The Times yesterday as well. Both puzzles were deemed 'tough' but I reckon Nestor ( my new unknown Indy colleague) 'out-toughed' me. Easier stuff from me today in the FT and the Daily Telegraph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the feedback. It was mine in The Times yesterday as well. Both puzzles were deemed &#8216;tough&#8217; but I reckon Nestor ( my new unknown Indy colleague) &#8216;out-toughed&#8217; me. Easier stuff from me today in the FT and the Daily Telegraph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[tilsit]]></title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2006/11/30/guardian-23937pasquale-pretty-tough-for-a-weekday-puzzle/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tilsit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=90#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Mea culpa for Indy -  could not get on line to post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mea culpa for Indy -  could not get on line to post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Peter Owen]]></title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2006/11/30/guardian-23937pasquale-pretty-tough-for-a-weekday-puzzle/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Owen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=90#comment-222</guid>
		<description>2D: Is the reference to passengers getting off trains at Didcot station?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2D: Is the reference to passengers getting off trains at Didcot station?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Fletch]]></title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2006/11/30/guardian-23937pasquale-pretty-tough-for-a-weekday-puzzle/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fletch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=90#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Maybe not, I just think of adjacent as being side by side and working better with an across clue.

No Indy blog today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe not, I just think of adjacent as being side by side and working better with an across clue.</p>
<p>No Indy blog today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[michod]]></title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2006/11/30/guardian-23937pasquale-pretty-tough-for-a-weekday-puzzle/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=90#comment-220</guid>
		<description>I don't see any problem with 'adjacent to' in a down clue - a given square can be adjacent to four others, two vertically and two horizontally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any problem with &#8216;adjacent to&#8217; in a down clue - a given square can be adjacent to four others, two vertically and two horizontally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Fletch]]></title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2006/11/30/guardian-23937pasquale-pretty-tough-for-a-weekday-puzzle/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fletch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=90#comment-219</guid>
		<description>While we're being picky, I wasn't sure about the use of 'adjacent to' in a down clue (19d).  But that could have more to do with the fact I know this setter to be very particular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re being picky, I wasn&#8217;t sure about the use of &#8216;adjacent to&#8217; in a down clue (19d).  But that could have more to do with the fact I know this setter to be very particular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[ilancaron]]></title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2006/11/30/guardian-23937pasquale-pretty-tough-for-a-weekday-puzzle/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ilancaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=90#comment-218</guid>
		<description>speaking of TA+KINGS in 14D, what role do Joseph and Mary play there other than make the surface more sensible (as links to the Wise Men)? I mean wouldn't the clue have been equally valid and vastly simpler as: "Grateful response to Wise Men for gifts?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of TA+KINGS in 14D, what role do Joseph and Mary play there other than make the surface more sensible (as links to the Wise Men)? I mean wouldn&#8217;t the clue have been equally valid and vastly simpler as: &#8220;Grateful response to Wise Men for gifts?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[BenIngton]]></title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2006/11/30/guardian-23937pasquale-pretty-tough-for-a-weekday-puzzle/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BenIngton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=90#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Thanks Peter.  Judging by the way the Ashes are going, my mind must obviously be subconsciously blocking out all thoughts of cricket...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Peter.  Judging by the way the Ashes are going, my mind must obviously be subconsciously blocking out all thoughts of cricket&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[petebiddlecombe]]></title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2006/11/30/guardian-23937pasquale-pretty-tough-for-a-weekday-puzzle/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[petebiddlecombe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=90#comment-216</guid>
		<description>19A: Maiden = M (cricket), amorous = warm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>19A: Maiden = M (cricket), amorous = warm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[BenIngton]]></title>
		<link>http://fifteensquared.net/2006/11/30/guardian-23937pasquale-pretty-tough-for-a-weekday-puzzle/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BenIngton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=90#comment-215</guid>
		<description>A real toughie - much pouring over atlas to get most of the names.

Still don't understand 19 ac though answer was obviously 'war'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A real toughie - much pouring over atlas to get most of the names.</p>
<p>Still don&#8217;t understand 19 ac though answer was obviously &#8216;war&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
